Two recent opinions from separate federal courts of appeal upheld the dismissal of lawsuits by sophisticated investors that suffered losses in the auction rate securities ("ARS") market against the securities broker-dealers that allegedly fraudulently induced the purchase of the ARS.1
The plaintiffs in the two separate lawsuits were identical: Ashland, Inc., a diversified global chemical company, and AshThree LLC, the special purpose entity that the company solely owned and operated (collectively, the "Company"). The Company contended that the securities broker-dealers had assured it that the ARS were safe, liquid instruments suitable to the Company's conservative investment policies.2 Furthermore, the Company maintained that not only did the securities broker-dealers represent that auction failures were very rare, but also that, should the need arise, the broker-dealers would act to prevent auction failures by placing sufficient proprietary bids. When the ARS market collapsed in February 2008, the Company was left with millions of dollars in illiquid ARS and, unable to sell most of these holdings, discounted them by millions of dollars and lost similar amounts in the few sales it did execute.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.