Claim Terms Are Considered In Computer Technology Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

EMC Corporation, et al. v. Pure Storage, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1985 - RGA, February 2, 2016.

Andrews, J.   Claim construction opinion issues regarding four terms from three patents.  A Markman hearing took place on January 8, 2016

The disputed technology relates to data stream technology. The following terms were considered:

  1. “summary”
  2. “receiving a data stream”
  3. “a respective parity segment”
  4. “each of the groups including N respective semiconductor memory segments”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide