Class Action Litigation -- Helping your business avoid or minimize the risk of exposure

more+
less-

A couple of novel tools are becoming increasingly available under Washington state and federal law, enabling businesses to reduce exposure to class and/or collective action litigation. Specifically, courts are more likely to enforce arbitration agreements, including provisions that waive one’s ability to pursue class and/ or collective actions. Therefore, a claimant would be limited to pursuing his or her claims in an arbitration format on an individual basis. Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court recently held open the possibility that an offer of judgment to an individual claimant may moot a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action, requiring dismissal of such a case.

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements -

Where a claimant attempts to circumvent an arbitration agreement and litigate a claim in court, courts consider whether a valid arbitration agreement exists and, if it does, whether the agreement encompasses the dispute at issue. As long as the answers to these two questions are affirmative, the court should send the claim to arbitration. In considering whether an arbitration agreement is valid, courts generally evaluate whether the agreement is procedurally or substantively unconscionable. Procedural unconscionability relates to the manner in which the agreement was entered into. Courts typically consider whether the claimant had a reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of the contract and whether the important terms regarding arbitration were hidden in a maze of fine print. Even if there is unequal bargaining power between the claimant and the defendant, Washington state courts are reluctant to find procedural unconscionability sufficient to justify invalidation of an otherwise enforceable arbitration agreement. Generally, it is important for businesses to provide the recipients of their proposed arbitration agreement with ample opportunity to read and understand the agreement and to ask questions about the same. In addition, using a stand-alone document for the arbitration agreement may be preferable to including arbitration terms within a larger, more complicated agreement.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lane Powell PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×