Class Action Quarterly - Winter 2013, Volume 2, Issue 1

In This Issue:

- Is the Ascertainability “Requirement” Plaintiffs’ New Foe?

- Whirlpool and Butler: Liability-Only Classes in a Post-Comcast World

- Recent Cases of Note

- Excerpt from Is the Ascertainability “Requirement” Plaintiffs’ New Foe?

There has been no shortage of attention given to the Supreme Court’s Wal-Mart and Comcast opinions, which address Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23’s commonality and predominance requirements. These groundbreaking opinions should not cause insurance company defendants to lose sight of other helpful developments in class certification jurisprudence. One such development is the recent attention the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has given the implied certification requirement of ‘ascertainability.’ In three decisions issued in 2012 and 2013, the Third Circuit has overturned trial courts’ certification of classes where it found the proposed classes could not be objectively and definitively identified...

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nelson Brown & Co. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Nelson Brown & Co. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.