Macris & Associates v. Images & Attitude

Collateral Estoppel prevents multiple cases covering the same claim from being tried.


The Utah Court of appeals held that signing and negotiating the two contracts at the same time made the second contract susceptible to a collateral estopple claim based on prior litigation of the first contract. Images was not happy with the performance of the products supplied by the supplier, but lost an arbitration hearing where a final decision was made finding Images liable for breach of contract. Images claimed fraudulent inducement into both contracts, and were both negotiated by the same person. The Court of Appeals held that because both contracts had substantially the same formation, Macris was already given the opportunity to contest their fraudulent inducement claims, and should be barred by collateral estopple from further opportunities to litigate the issue.

The case and case summary are also available at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.