Comcast Corp. v. Behrend - Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments


[author: Joshua Roberts]

The Supreme Court heard oral argument this month in Comcast Corp. et al. v. Behrend et al., No. 11-864, where the parties fought over whether the lower courts took a close enough look at plaintiffs’ model for damages.  The issues underlying oral arguments concerned the amount that class action plaintiffs are required to prove during the early stages of litigation.  Obviously, the greater the amount, the greater the burden for would be class action plaintiffs.  Specifically, this case turns on whether a class can be certified without a district court considering whether plaintiffs have provided admissible evidence showing damages could be awarded on a class-wide basis.  From the Justices’ comments, it appears that the Court will use this case to formulate a rule governing the amount of  inquiry a judge will need to do on expert damages testimony before certifying a class.  We will keep you posted as this case progresses.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »