Comment on Petitioner's Brief: McDonald v. City of Chicago


In the brief filed with the Supreme Court of the United States, Petitioners argue to overturn the Slaughterhouse Cases in reference to the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

What Petitioners failed to see in their references to the Slaughterhouse Cases was that there were two citizens the Court was referring to, and not one. The Petitioners also failed to see that Section 1, Clause 1 and Section 1, Clause 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment were treated differently by the Slaughterhouse court. The purported quote of Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 (OF) was nothing unusual in Slaughterhouse. And, the Petitioners also make the erroneous conclusion about a citizen of a State being the same as a citizen of the several States.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dan Goodman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Dan Goodman on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.