Commissioner Proposes Successor To Rule 260.204.9

With the enactment of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, Congress divided registration authority over investment advisers between the Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators. In general, large advisers (i.e., those with at least $25 million in assets under management) were required to register with the SEC and smaller advisers were subject to state registration.

Fund advisers, however, found themselves in an anomalous situation. Because former Section 203(b)(3) of the Investment Advisers Act exempted advisers with fewer than 15 clients, many did not register with the SEC. However, failure to register exposed them to state registration requirements. California’s Department of Corporations responded by adopting Rule 260.204.9. That rule exempted from state registration certain advisers having assets under management of at least $25 million or exclusively advising “venture capital companies” as defined.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Business Organization Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »