Competition class actions off to a slow but steady start

by Allen & Overy LLP
Contact

Allen & Overy LLP

The first judgment on class certification for competition class actions has been issued by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.  The judgment will reassure potential defendants, as the Tribunal demanded greater rigour from the Claimants in proving that the class deserved class certification.  The Claimants failed to meet the required standard, and were told to go away and start again.  However, potential claimants will take comfort from the fact that the Tribunal took a balanced approach, and adjourned the application pending further evidence, rather than dismissing it out of hand.

Summary 

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) introduced competition law class actions in the UK, including “opt-out” proceedings for UK claimants.  Ms Dorothy Perkins, General Secretary of the National Pensioners Convention, has brought the first case for class certification of an opt-out class of Claimants. Pride Mobility Products Limited, the Defendant, had previously been found by the OFT to have infringed competition law in relation to the supply of mobility scooters, and Ms Perkins sought a collective proceedings order (a CPO) on behalf of all purchasers of Pride mobility scooters in the relevant period.  In its recent judgment1, the Tribunal found fault with the definition of the proposed classes and the methodology used to formulate them.  However, the claims were not dismissed, and instead the Tribunal adjourned the application with permission for the applicant to file an amended claim and further expert economic evidence in support.  This shows a balanced approach, as the finer detail of the class action regime is developed in the UK. 

Lessons for potential class action claimants 

The Tribunal contrasted the UK and US approaches to class certification, noting that the UK regime is intended to proceed to class certification “with either no or only very limited disclosure and shorter hearings held within months of the claim form being served.”  The application for a CPO was, in the Tribunal’s own words “…not a mini trial, and the essential question is whether the Applicant has established a sufficiently sound and proper basis to proceed, having regard to the statutory criteria”.  This required the Applicant to show that the claims raised common issues suitable to be brought in collective proceedings, and that it was just and reasonable for the proposed representative to represent the class.    

The OFT decision on which the Applicant relied had found that Pride entered into anti-competitive agreements in relation to online price advertising restrictions with Relevant Retailers in relation to Relevant Models of mobility scooter.  The Tribunal held that the Applicant’s proposed sub-classes of claimants did not distinguish between customers who had purchased from Relevant Retailers and customers who had purchased from other Pride retailers, whose prices may well have been influenced by the online price advertising restrictions, but who had not themselves been found by the OFT to have entered into any anti-competitive agreement with Pride.  Ms. Perkins was ordered to re-formulate her definition of sub-classes of claimants, and provide further expert economic evidence to support.  

The Tribunal also made it clear that there were further factors to consider before making a CPO.  The Tribunal has said that the amended claim must address not only questions of quantification, but of causation and that the revised claim may still face “considerable difficulties”.  Even once the Applicant reformulates her case, the Tribunal has said that it may need to further consider the suitability of this case for collective proceedings, depending on the revised assessment of likely costs and damages. 

Note of caution for potential defendants 

This decision will encourage potential defendants, as it shows that potential claimants will be held to a high standard in proving that a class deserves class certification.  However, the Tribunal is keen to encourage an effective mechanism for collective redress, and took a balanced approach, finding against the defendant on a number of important points, including: 

  • Pride challenged the retrospectivity of the transitional provisions that allowed the Applicant to bring the claim under the CRA, relying unsuccessfully on the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act, fundamental principles of EU law and/or the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.  The CAT dismissed these arguments, largely on the basis that the new collective proceedings regime, while being a new form of procedure, does not establish a new cause of action (the claimants could previously have brought their claims, albeit on an individual basis).  The CAT also held that Pride’s legitimate expectations were not breached when it decided not to appeal the OFT decision prior to the introduction of the CRA, as the new regime was foreseeable at that point, having been published as a bill and read in Parliament by the time of the OFT decision.

  • Pride strongly resisted the adjournment to allow the Applicant to reformulate its case, on the basis that the Applicant had had ample time to prepare her claim and there being no realistic prospect of the Applicant formulating her case in a way that was suitable for an aggregate award of damages.  The CAT rejected those arguments, holding that the Applicant should be allowed the opportunity to reformulate her case.

  • The CAT held that, if the issues with the proposed class discussed above can be overcome, then the case would justify class certification on an opt-out basis “given the size of the class, the fact that the class members are individual consumers, and the estimated amount that each represented class member could recover.”

  • The CAT held that it would be just and reasonable for Ms Gibson to act as the class representative, dismissing Pride’s arguments that she was unsuitable as she was not herself a member of the proposed class, that she did not have prior experience of managing litigation and dismissing at this stage Pride’s arguments in relation to her ability to potentially pay Pride’s costs.  

Footnote: 

1   Dorothy Gibson v Pride Mobility Products Ltd [2017] CAT 9 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen & Overy LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen & Overy LLP
Contact
more
less

Allen & Overy LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!