Conditions on using an Alcotest in NJ

more+
less-

On St. Patrick’s Day 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its opinion in State v. Chun, drawing to a close over six

years of litigation regarding whether the Draeger Alcotest 7110 MKIII-C breathtesting device using software version NJ 3.11 was reliable for any evidential use in New Jersey courts. The Court upheld most, but not all, of the findings and conclusions of its special master, the Hon. Michael Patrick King, P.J.A.D. ret., who had presided over remand proceedings in the matter for approximately two years. The Court found the Alcotest was reliable, but only on very extensive and specific conditions. These conditions have been the subject of continued litigation in the trial courts, and are now making their way up the appellate ladder. This article reviews Chun in detail and the case law

since it was decided, as well as provide some history and a few

back stories to round out the picture.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Criminal Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jeffrey Gold, Gold & Associates, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Jeffrey Gold
Gold & Associates, P.C.

Jeffrey Evan Gold is a 1981 graduate of the Rutgers School of Law. Mr. Gold has been twice honored... View Profile »


Follow Gold & Associates, P.C.:

Reporters on Deadline