Conflict Minerals: Court Orders NAM to File Response to En Banc Rehearing Petition

The SEC, the perceived loser in the conflicts minerals case at the time, filed a petition for an en banc rehearing on May 29, 2014.  NAM, the perceived winner at the time, stayed silent.  After these many months, with public companies looking for clarity on their future obligations, the DC Court of Appeals has ordered NAM to file a response to the petition for an en banc rehearing.

According to the Court of Appeals, the SEC shouldn’t bother with a reply to NAM’s response absent a court order.

So it looks like it’s going nowhere fast.

Written by:

more+
less-

Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×