While oral arguments often are an uncertain guide to how the Supreme Court will vote, the Justices’ questions and comments during the second day of oral arguments about the Affordable Care Act signaled that the Supreme Court’s decision could be much closer than many had thought.
On behalf of various respondents, Paul Clement and Michael Carvin both argued that the Affordable Care Act exceeds Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause for two main reasons: (1) Congress has the power to regulate existing commerce, but not to force people to engage in commerce; and (2) the individual mandate is not a “necessary and proper” means of executing an otherwise constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate commerce. Four justices seemed to agree, but four justices seemed to view the individual mandate's constitutionality differently.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Health Law Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Insurance Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Robert Pohls, Pohls & Associates | Attorney Advertising