Contractor May Recover Against Public Entity for Failure to Disclose Material Information Without Proving Fraud

more+
less-

It has long been the rule in California that a contractor on a fixed price public works project generally cannot recover additional compensation simply because unanticipated difficulties are encountered. However, consistent with long standing federal authority, United States v. Spearin (1918) 248 U.S. 132, a contractor may have an avenue for redress when its performance is more expensive than contemplated at bid time due to faulty plans and specifications or the public entity's failure to disclose material information regarding the project.

Until recently, there was much uncertainty in California about when and under what circumstances a contractor may recover based upon a non disclosure theory. In Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (LAUSD) v. Great American Insurance Co. (2010) 49 Cal.4th 739, the California Supreme Court articulated the circumstances under which a contractor can maintain an action against a public entity for failure to disclose material information.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Construction Updates, Government Contracting Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Snell & Wilmer | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »