Court Declares Bank Trash Talk Statute Facially Unconstitutional


In my October 2010 post “Don’t Talk Trash About A California Bank“, I discussed Financial Code Section 756 (subsequently reenacted verbatim as Section 1327).  That statute generally criminalizes spreading false rumors about a bank.  In my post, I speculated on whether the statute was constitutional:

Moreover, it seems that prosecution would invite a claim that the statute violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, § 2(a) of the California Constitution.  That is what happened with a similar Nevada statute, NRS 668.10.  [citing Culinary Workers Union Local 226 v. Frankie Sue Del Pappa, 200 F.3d 614 (1999)].

Earlier this week, the First District Court of Appeal concluded that Section 1327 is facially unconstitutional because it:

  • does not include a malice element;
  • is vague;
  • is overbroad; and
  • is a content-based regulation on speech.

Summit Bank v. Rogers, 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 633 (May 29, 2012).

The decision arose from a lawsuit by a community bank against a former employee who posted allegedly defamatory messages on a section of the Internet Website.  The employee moved to strike under California’s “anti-SLAPP” statute, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.6, on the grounds that the bank’s suit was for the purpose of chilling the employee’s right to speak freely about the bank.  The bank responded by arguing that the employee was precluded from using the anti-SLAPP statute because his posts were illegal under Financial Code Section 1327.  Because the court found the statute unconstitutional, the employee’s conduct, even if it violated the statute, was not illegal as a matter of law.

For additional posts regarding the application of California’s anti-SLAPP statute in corporate and securities law cases, see “Court Holds Vote To Remove Director Is Not An Exercise Of Free Speech“, “Court of Appeal Decides Buy-Out Questions Under Re-RULPA“, and “Court Slaps Down Section 25400 Market Manipulation Claim Against Convicted Felon“.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.