Court Denies an Adverse Interference Absent Materiality (New York)


Cognex Corporation v. Microscan Systems, Inc., 2013 WL 6906221 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 31, 2013).

in this patent infringement suit, the defendants moved for sanctions for spoliation of a disk that was essentially destroyed during transit between the plaintiffs’ expert and the plaintiffs. While the court found the plaintiffs’ failure to make a copy of the CD was a sufficiently culpable act warranting sanctions, it reasoned that material damage to the defendants must be shown to trigger an adverse interference instruction. Because the defendants failed to show how the information was lost on the CD—software relating to the device at issue—was material, the adverse interference was denied. However, the court granted monetary sanctions for spoliation finding that the plaintiffs nonetheless acted culpably under a duty to preserve.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kroll Ontrack Inc. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.