Court Denies Cell-Tower Company's Challenge to Initiative Requiring Voter-Approval Before City Can Lease Property


Decision Could Be Relevant to Upcoming FCC Rulemaking

An appellate court last week ruled that a provision of the federal Communications Act limiting how a local government may regulate the “placement, construction, and modification” of wireless-service facilities does not preempt a local initiative requiring voters to grant prior approval to the lease or license of certain city property. In the court’s view, Section 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act “applies only to local zoning and land use decisions and does not address a municipality’s property rights as a landowner.” The court found that the local initiative affected only the city’s approvals as a landowner, not its land-use regulation or adjudication. See more details on the decision at the IMLA Appellate Blog.

While the decision in a Huntington Beach case by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is good news for local governments and reaffirms a long-standing principle that federal preemption does not affect local governments acting in their proprietary capacities, its long-term impact may turn on the outcome of a new Federal Communications Commission rulemaking, which could limit local authority to control the size and placement of wireless facilities.

In that proceeding, the FCC asks whether regulatory limits that apply to a local government when it acts as a land-use regulator should also apply when the government leases its property.  The FCC tentatively concludes, consistent with this court decision, that regulatory limits do not apply when a local government acts in a proprietary role, but the industry may urge the Commission to take a different position.

A coalition of interested parties will be filing joint comments before the FCC’s February 3 deadline to encourage the federal agency to respect local interests.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.