Court Holds Compensation Committee Had No Duty to Alter Compensation After Failed Say-On-Pay Vote

[author: ]

In 2011, 52% of Dex One Corporation’s shareholders voted against Dex One’s 2010 executive compensation as disclosed in its proxy statement.  Plaintiff Brad Haberland subsequently commenced a derivative action claiming, among other things, that Dex One’s directors breached their fiduciary duties when the directors failed to alter or amend the compensation plan after the failed say-on-pay advisory vote.

The United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division dismissed the claim.  In so doing, the court referred to the plain language of the Dodd-Frank Act which states “The shareholder vote referred to in subsection[] (a),” however, “shall not be binding on the [corporation] or the board of directors of [the corporation], and may not be construed. . . as overruling a decision by such [corporation] or board of directors [,]. . . to create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of such [corporation] or board of directors[,] . . . [or] to create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for such [corporation] or board of directors. . . .”

Check frequently for updated information on the JOBS Act, the Dodd-Frank Act and other important securities law matters.

Written by:


Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.