Court Holds That Statute Of Limitations Applies To Section 50(a)(6) Constitutional Claims

more+
less-

In Priester v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., homeowners sued for declaratory relief against their lender claiming that the lien on their home was void under the Texas Constitution. No. 12-40032, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3097 (5th Cir. February 13, 2013).  The plaintiffs alleged that the lender violated several provisions of Section 50(a)(6) of the Texas Constitution: that the lender did not give them a 12-day notice, that the lien agreement was closed in their living room, and that the lender did not cure when served with notice.  The lender alleged that the plaintiffs' claim was barred by the statute of limitations.  The court of appeals held that the residual four-year statute of limitations applied to the plaintiff's claim.  It also held that limitations accrued at the time that the lien was created -- not later when notice of defect was served. The court affirmed the judgment for the lender.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Winstead PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Winstead PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×