Schmelling v Whitty et al

Court of Appeals Interprets Notice of Non-Party Fault Offset to Apply Even if Party at Fault Cannot Be Liable in Suit

more+
less-

The Court of Appeals here confirms my thinking that even if a party would not be liable in suit, e.g., as a governmental entity for immunity or for some other reason (in this case the exclusive remedy provision of the Workmens’ Compensation Disability Act), a defendant can still attribute “fault” to that party for purposes of offset under Michigan's Comparative Fault scheme. To my knowledge this has not been applied in the immunity setting, but the purpose of the notice of non-party fault provision and the offset would seem to apply vis-à-vis the defendant giving the notice regardless. Interesting issue. The Court of Appeals seems to agree. See the highlighted section. Thanks and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Carson Tucker

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Worker’s Compensation Updates, Business Torts Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 6th Circuit, Michigan | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carson Tucker, Lacey & Jones, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »