The Court of Appeals here confirms my thinking that even if a party would not be liable in suit, e.g., as a governmental entity for immunity or for some other reason (in this case the exclusive remedy provision of the Workmens’ Compensation Disability Act), a defendant can still attribute “fault” to that party for purposes of offset under Michigan's Comparative Fault scheme. To my knowledge this has not been applied in the immunity setting, but the purpose of the notice of non-party fault provision and the offset would seem to apply vis-à-vis the defendant giving the notice regardless. Interesting issue. The Court of Appeals seems to agree. See the highlighted section. Thanks and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Carson Tucker
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates, Worker’s Compensation Updates, Business Torts Updates
Reference Info:Decision | State, 6th Circuit, Michigan | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Carson Tucker, Law Offices of Carson J. Tucker, JD, MSEL | Attorney Advertising