Court of Federal Claims: Merged Corporations are the Same Taxpayer for Interest Netting


In Wells Fargo, the Court of Federal Claims held that a taxpayer may net underpayment balances and overpayment balances among merged entities under Section 6621(d).  Section 6621(d) provides that, to the extent the “same taxpayer” has overpayments and underpayments of the same amount outstanding, the net rate of interest during such period is zero.  The issue in the case was whether merged entities are the “same taxpayer” for purposes of Section 6621(d), such that their overpayment and underpayment balances may be netted. 

The taxpayer argued that the term “same taxpayer” includes both predecessors of the surviving corporation in a statutory merger because the entities become one and the same entity as a matter of law.  The government, however, argued that entities are only the “same taxpayer” if they have the same taxpayer identification number at the time of the initial tax overpayment or underpayment. 

The Court of Federal Claims agreed with the taxpayer and found that a taxpayer may net underpayment balances and overpayment balances among merged entities because the acquiring corporation becomes one and the same with the target corporation by operation of law.  Because the surviving corporation steps into the shoes of the acquired entity and the surviving corporation is liable for the tax payments of its predecessors, it is irrelevant whether the underpayment and overpayment balances arose before or after the merger.

This decision is very significant.  The Court of Federal Claims rejected the government’s overly narrow view of interest netting and correctly allowed netting in the context of merged corporations.  The court’s reasoning presents a strong case for extending the holding to other situations such as liquidations and acquisitions when the acquiring corporation legally assumes the target’s tax liabilities, whether by operation of law or contractually.  The opinion of the Court of Federal Claims is available here.



Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thompson & Knight LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.