Court protects privacy in ruling on warrantless searches of cellphones


Every now and then The Nine agree on something. Among the unanimous rulings the U.S. Supreme Court issued in the final stretch this year was Riley v. California, which held that law enforcement officials may not make a warrantless search of a person’s cellphone incident to an otherwise lawful arrest.

(Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote separately but concurred in the judgment. So The Nine mostly agreed, at least.) While some commentators lauded the ruling as a “sweeping” vindication of privacy rights in the digital age, others took a more blasé tone, calling the decision constitutionally sound and protective of individual liberties, but declining to lionize the justices as digital pioneers for grasping that smartphones are fundamentally different from, say, the contents of someone’s wallet or glove compartment.

Originally published in The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin on August 12, 2014.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Loeb & Loeb LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Loeb & Loeb LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.