Court Rules NCAA Violated Antitrust Laws: But Did The NCAA Win By Losing?


A federal court has ruled that the NCAA cannot ban schools from giving athletes money based on their name, image and likeness, and cannot impose a salary cap below $5,000.  See O'Bannon v. NCAA (N.D. Calif Aug. 8, 2014).  The newspaper headlines will call this a defeat for the NCAA, but there may be a silver lining.  This interesting SBNation article argues that the biggest winner in the ruling is the NCAA itself since it was likely going to allow schools to offer a stipend anyway, and rather than opening up the market, this ruling appears to allow the NCAA to set limits on such compensation.  We followed this case in previous posts, and will likely discuss it in more detail later.  There is a lot to go through in the Court's 99 page opinion.


Topics:  Antitrust Provisions, College Athletes, Colleges, NCAA, Universities

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Art, Entertainment & Sports Updates, General Business Updates, Education Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »