Court-Sanctioned Employee Theft, or a Workable 7-Part Test to Resolve Employee Taking of Confidential Documents?


The New Jersey Supreme Court’s December 2, 2010 decision in Quinlan v. Curtiss-Wright, 204 N.J. 239 (2010) has spurred much debate among legal commentators about whether the New Jersey Supreme Court has opened a Pandora’s Box and sanctioned employee theft of documents. In Quinlan, the Court ruled that Joyce Quinlan, an employee of Curtiss-Wright, engaged in protected conduct in copying confidential data in the workplace and feeding it to her attorney for use in her ongoing discrimination lawsuit. A close review of the decision shows that the legal commentators have likely overreacted, and that Quinlan provides a workable, 7-part test to be applied in determining whether an employee’s theft of documents in the workplace can constitute protected activity under state employment statutes. The decision most certainly should prompt employers to closely analyze their workplace handbooks and be sure to keep close tabs on, and clearly mark and limit disclosure of, confidential data.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kevin O'Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »