Los Angeles General Order Second Amended No. 29, commonly referred to as "G.O. 29," was an important discovery tool for defendants in asbestos cases. Unfortunately, on Tuesday, December 18, the California Court of Appeal ruled in Snyder v. A.W. Chesterton that G.O. 29 was invalid because the requirements of G.O. 29 conflict with the work product doctrine which protects attorneys’ impressions, opinions, and conclusions.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.