Court Strikes Down Los Angeles General Order 29

Los Angeles General Order Second Amended No. 29, commonly referred to as "G.O. 29," was an important discovery tool for defendants in asbestos cases. Unfortunately, on Tuesday, December 18, the California Court of Appeal ruled in Snyder v. A.W. Chesterton that G.O. 29 was invalid because the requirements of G.O. 29 conflict with the work product doctrine which protects attorneys’ impressions, opinions, and conclusions.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Toxic Torts Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »