Coverage for Climate Change Claims, An Uphill Fight


On April 19, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of American Electric Power Co. Inc. v. Connecticut, No. 10-174, will hear oral argument on the question of whether states and private parties may maintain actions for nuisance under federal common law based on allegations that the defendants, electric utilities, contributed to global warming by their carbon dioxide emissions. The litgation should give pause to both industrial concerns and their liability insurers. Although the defendants advance strong arguments for dismissal before the Supreme Court, these arguments are for the most part specific to the federal forum (e.g., standing, the political question doctrine, the existence of a federal claim). It seems unlikely the Supreme Court will completely close the door on these suits, and climate change litigation, in one form or another, will continue.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Environmental Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Duane Morris LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »