Currents - Energy Industry Insights - January 2018 - Issue 2

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
Contact

Ohio Supreme Court Joins Texas and Oklahoma in Holding the State Does Not Recognize a Separate Implied Covenant to Explore Further -

"We conclude that Ohio does not recognize an 'implied covenant to explore further' separate and apart from the implied covenant of reasonable development."

Why this is important: Landowners held interests in approximately 74 acres of land in Washington County, Ohio, not far from the Ohio River. The land was subject to a 1980 oil and gas lease. In return for permission to mine the land, the company committed to making royalty payments based upon the amount of gas produced from the land and to deliver a portion of the oil produced from the land to the lessors. The lease was silent as to certain drilling aspects....

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC
Contact
more
less

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide