Dante’s Third Ring: Lehman Investors Bring Adversary Proceeding In SDNY Bankruptcy Court

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Contact

Editor’s Note:  This article first appeared on CorporateLiveWire.com and is republished here with permission.  For the original article click here.

The battle over the enforceability of priority flip clauses in CDO indentures has entered a new phase.  On February 8, 2012, a group of investors led by Belmont Park Investments Pty Ltd. filed an adversary proceeding against Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. and BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.  The Investors seek recognition of a judgment entered by the High Court of Justice in England and Wales in Belmont Park Inv. Pty Ltd. & Others v. BNY Corp.  Trustee Servs. Ltd., and a declaration that, as a matter of English law, the Investors have priority over LBSF, as swap provider, with respect to shared collateral securing notes issued under Lehman Brothers’ “Dante Programme.”  The Investors filed a concurrent motion to withdraw the reference, seeking to remove the adversary proceeding from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to the U.S. District Court.

Bankruptcy Judge James M. Peck previously found that the U.S. Bankruptcy Code prohibited enforcement of the same “flip” clause at issue here – despite the fact that the English courts had previously found the clause to be valid under English law.  Judge Peck’s decision not only impacted the Lehman CDOs, but roiled the entire securitization market.  Flip clauses regarding payments to swap providers are common features of many securitization programs.

The Dante Programme

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) arranged the Dante Programme, which consists of multiple series of synthetic, credit-linked CDOs in the form of notes linked to credit default swaps.  English law governs the transactions, and the parties agreed to jurisdiction in the English courts.  The Issuers of each series of notes – including Saphir Finance Public Limited Co., Beryl Finance Limited and Zircon Finance Limited – also served as the counterparty to LBSF under the credit default swaps, and used the proceeds from the sale of the notes to purchase collateral.  The Issuers then pledged the collateral to BNY, as trustee, to secure their obligations to the noteholders and LBSF.

Under the clauses at issue, money flowing out of the Issuers would first be applied to pay amounts owed to LBSF, under the swaps.  However, if either LBSF or Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed bankruptcy, the trust documents flipped seniority, placing LBSF at the bottom of the waterfall.  The swaps incorporated the CDO waterfall.

LBHI filed for chapter 11 protection under the Bankruptcy Code on September 15, 2008.  The filing triggered events of default under the credit default swaps and triggered the flip clauses, which allowed the noteholders to leapfrog LBSF and take first priority against the collateral.  LBSF filed for chapter 11 protection shortly after LBHI, on October 3, 2008.  Subsequently, the Issuers terminated the credit default swaps with LBSF and issued notices declaring the notes due and payable at their early redemption amount.

The English Dante Decision

In May 2009, Perpetual Trust Company, which held CDOs in two series of notes issued under the Dante Programme, commenced an action in the High Court of Justice in England, seeking a judgment requiring BNY to distribute the collateral to the noteholders in accordance with the flip clauses.  In June 2009, Belmont Park brought a separate action seeking substantially the same relief, which was heard at the same time as the Perpetual action.

On July 28, 2009, the High Court issued a judgment in favor of the noteholders and against LBSF, holding that (i) LBSF committed events of default under the swap agreements on September 15, 2008 and October 3, 2008; (ii) the Issuers properly terminated the swap agreements; (iii) the flip clauses are valid, effective and enforceable under English law; and (iv) LBHI’s September 15, 2008 bankruptcy filing automatically triggered the flip clauses.

On November 6, 2009, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales dismissed LBSF’s appeal and affirmed the High Court judgment.  On July 27, 2011, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom affirmed the decisions of the Court of Appeal and the High Court.  The High Court has taken no further action with respect to the collateral since the Supreme Court entered its judgment.

The U.S. Decision

At the end of May 2009, while the English action was pending, LBSF asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for a summary judgment that the ipso facto provisions of the Bankruptcy Code rendered the flip clauses unenforceable.  BNY filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, arguing that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court must defer to the English courts’ rulings in the Perpetual case, and that, even if the flip clauses were unenforceable ipso facto clauses, the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provisions permitted their enforcement.

On January 25, 2010, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court ruled that the flip clauses were unenforceable ipso facto clauses under the facts of the case, and that because the trust documents contained the flip clauses, rather than the swap agreements, the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provisions did not apply.  BNY appealed to the U.S. District Court, but the parties settled the case before the appeal was heard.

The Investors’ Adversary Proceeding

In the new adversary complaint, the Belmont Investors seek an order recognizing and enforcing the High Court’s judgment on the basis of international comity.  In addition, the Investors seek an order (i) declaring that the flip clauses are valid, effective and enforceable, and (ii) declaring that BNY may distribute the collateral to the noteholders in accordance with the flip clauses, without exposing itself to liability in the U.S. or under U.S. law.

The Investors cite to the English courts’ determination that the flip clauses were automatically triggered by LBHI’s September 15, 2008 bankruptcy filing, and argue that by the time LBSF filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, it no longer possessed first priority rights in the collateral.  The Investors assert that because LBSF did not possess first priority rights in the collateral as of October 3, 2008, the operation of the flip clauses does not implicate the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay or prohibitions on ipso facto clauses.  The Investors also assert that, even if LBSF’s bankruptcy alone triggered the flip clauses, the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provisions exempt the flip clauses from both the automatic stay and the anti ipso facto provisions.

Conclusion

For the past two years, the law regarding the enforceability of flip clauses has been in flux.  The new action filed by the Investors has the potential to bring more certainty to the area, although it is also possible that the Investors could prevail on narrow grounds, specific to the facts of this case.

Mark Ellenberg is a partner in the Financial Restructuring Department of Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft, LLP, where he advises debtors and creditors in complex financial restructuring, workout and bankruptcy matters.  A recognized expert on issues relating to swaps, derivatives and other trading contracts, he represented a number of creditors in the Lehman bankruptcy cases and also was special counsel to Enron for issues relating to the close out of its trading book.  Mark became a fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy in 2004 and is listed in Who’s Who Legal USA and the International Who’s Who of Insolvency and Restructuring Lawyers.  He has also been recognized as a leading lawyer by several publications, including Chambers USA, The Washingtonian and LawDragon, which named him one of the 500 best lawyers in the United States.  Mark can be reached at +1 202 862 2234 or Mark.Ellenberg@Cwt.Com

Doug Mintz is a Special Counsel in the Cadwalader Financial Restructuring Department, who can be reached at +1 202 862 2475 orDouglas.Mintz@Cwt.Com.

Kathryn Borgeson is an associate in the Cadwalader Financial Restructuring Department, who can be reached at +1 202 862 2384 orKathryn.Borgeson@Cwt.Com.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Contact
more
less

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!