D.C. Circuit To Consider Requirements For Compelled Disclosures


The D.C. Circuit will rehear American Meat Institute v. U.S. Department of Agriculture en banc later this month. This case presents a First Amendment challenge to a rule requiring that meat products be labeled with precise country of origin information at each of three production steps. 

Last month, a panel of the D.C. Circuit upheld the lower court ruling in the case, which held that the rule did not violate the First Amendment. 

When it hears the case en banc, the D.C. Circuit will consider what the government must show in order to regulate commercial speech by requiring disclosures that are purely factual and non-controversial.

The trade associations challenging the Department of Agriculture rule have argued that the government can only require factual disclosures where it has an interest in correcting deception. The D.C. Circuit panel--and the other circuits who have addressed the issue--disagreed and held that the government may require factual, non-controversial disclosures where other governmental interests are involved. 

In this case, the D.C. Circuit panel said that the governmental interests underlying the country of origin labeling rule justified the intrusion on the First Amendment rights of the trade associations challenging the rule. Those governmental interests included "enabling a consumer to apply patriotic or protectionist criteria in the choice of meat" and enabling "one who believes that United States practices and regulations are better at assuring food safety than those of other countries, or indeed the reverse, to act on that premise." 

Parties looking to challenge statutes or rules requiring disclosure of non-controversial factual information should watch for the D.C. Circuit's en banc decision in this matter. 

American Meat Institute v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, No. 13-5281, __F.3d __(D.C.Cir. 2014).


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holland & Knight LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Holland & Knight LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.