DC Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment to Halliburton in Important FCA Case

On March 14, U.S. Federal Judge Royce Lamberth granted Halliburton’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Mr. Barko’s claims against Halliburton, filed under the False Claims Act (FCA), which, along the way, resulted in important rulings protecting the attorney client privilege. The case is United States of America ex rel. Harry Barko v. Halliburton Company, et al. As a result of Judge Lamberth’s ruling, this long and protracted litigation may be nearing an end after twelve years and several decision by the federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The case involves a Halliburton subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR), a Department of Defense contractor providing support services to the U.S. military during the war in Iraq, and KBR’s contracting practices. Harry Barko was a former KBR subcontract administrator in Iraq from July 2004 to June 2015.  His FCA complaint alleges that KBR submitted false claims to the federal government and otherwise engaged in improper procurement practices with its subcontractor Daoud & Partners.

The principal issues decided by the federal courts in Washington involved Halliburton’s argument that certain discovery requests made by  Barko implicated important attorney-client privilege issues, which were decided in Halliburton’s favor (the DC Circuit opinions are reported In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., et al. in 2014 and In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., et al. in 2015).  The Judge Lamberth concluded that while “Mr. Barko has presented an incredible amount of information to this Court regarding, among many other things, KBR’s subcontracting practices and other activities in Iraq… not every instance of waste, fraud, mismanagement, or breach of contract translates into a False Claims Act violation.”  Moreover, Mr. Barko failed to present admissible evidence to support his clams, and ultimately failed to make a FCA case that would survive a motion for summary judgment.

 


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Pillsbury - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×