December 2013: Russian Litigation Update

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact

Russian Courts on Anti-Suit Injunctions. More than a year ago Anton Ivanov, the Chairman of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court, openly criticized foreign anti-suit injunctions affecting Russian proceedings as an example of “unfair competition” between judicial systems. In this context, it is interesting to consider the approach adopted in Russian case law to foreign anti-suit injunctions and to obtaining similar injunctions in Russian courts.

Foreign Anti-Suit Injunctions in the Russian Case Law. In the beginning, the attitude of Russian courts to anti-suit injunctions from foreign courts was rather hostile. In Roust Holdings Ltd. v. Cetelem SA (2005), the Russian court declared that the English anti-suit injunction obtained by Cetelem SA in support of an ICC injunction in London violated the constitutional right for judicial protection and could not be enforced in Russia. The court requested that the parties pursue the case in Russia and noted that any actions to the contrary would be regarded as contempt of court. Shortly afterwards, the parties settled the dispute.

Subsequently, Russian courts adopted a more measured approach to foreign anti-suit injunctions. In JFC Group Ltd. v. Star Reefers Pool Inc. (2010), JFC Group Ltd. filed a motion to stay Russian proceedings on the basis of the anti-suit injunction issued by the High Court of Justice (England). The court granted the motion and ordered JFC Group Ltd. to notify the court of any changes relating to anti-suit injunction. Interestingly, a year later JFC Group Ltd. notified the Russian court that the anti-suit injunction was still in place, but this time the Russian court resumed proceedings and continued with merits of the case, though JFC Group Ltd. could not take part in the proceedings because of the injunction.

A relatively measured approach to foreign anti-suit injunctions was taken in Ingosstrakh Investments v. BNP Paribas SA and OJSC Russian Machines. BNP Paribas brought an LCIA case against Oleg Deripaska’s Russian Machines seeking enforcement of a guarantee issued by Russian Machines to BNP Paribas. After that, a minority shareholder of Russian Machines, represented by its trustee Ingosstrakh Investments, initiated Russian proceedings against BNP Paribas and Russian Machines, seeking invalidation of the guarantee. BNP Paribas obtained an anti-suit injunction prohibiting Russian Machines and Ingosstrakh Investments from pursuing the claim in Russia. By the time the injunction was granted, the Russian court had already delivered a judgment and declared the validity of the guarantee, and Ingosstrakh Investments had already appealed that judgment. In these circumstances, Ingosstrakh Investments and Russian Machines moved for a hearing in absentia in the Russian appellate court, which affirmed the validity of the guarantee in their absence. The defeated party lodged a cassation appeal. In the cassation hearing BNP Paribas tried to challenge the jurisdiction of the court based on an active interim order against the parties. The Russian cassation court rejected this argument, proceeded to consider the case with BNP Paribas being the only party in attendance, and also affirmed the validity of the guarantee.

On July 9, 2013, the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation (the “Presidium”) issued Clarifications on the court practice on cases involving foreign parties. The BNP Paribas case served as a basis for clarification. The Presidium stated that “anti-suit injunctions issued by a foreign court cannot prevent a case from being considered by a Russian court that has jurisdiction to hear the case.”

The key conclusions drawn by the Presidium are the following:

• all states are equal and sovereign, and a court of one state cannot impose restrictions on a court of a different state;
• an anti-suit injunction issued by a foreign court does not prevent a Russian court from considering the case and does not have other legal effects in Russia; and
• anti-suit injunction, however, binds the parties, and they should weigh the risks and implications of non-compliance with the anti-suit injunction

At the same time the Supreme Arbitrazh Court has not expressed a view on anti-suit injunctions from Russian courts. We will consider this issue below.

Anti-Suit Injunctions by Russian Courts. Russian law does not specifically provide for anti-suit injunctions. A Russian court, however, may grant injunctive relief provided that:

• the interim relief sought is related to and corresponds to the subject-matter of the dispute; and
• failure to apply the interim relief may impede or render impossible the enforcement of future judgment, or is likely to inflict substantial harm to the applicant.

The issue of the anti-suit injunction had already arisen in Russian proceedings. In August 2012, the Arbitrazh Court of the City of Moscow considered an application for anti-suit injunction in a case between Novolipetsk Metallurgical Plant and Mr. Nikolay Maximov and his JSC Maxi-Group. Dismissing the application, the court ruled that the injunction sought was not related to the subject matter of the dispute and that denying the injunction would not prevent enforcement of a future judgment. Although the court dismissed the application on formal grounds, it did not rule, as a matter of principle, on the power of Russian courts to issue anti-suit injunctions.

In summary, since July 9, 2013, Russian courts have been given guidance on how to deal with foreign anti-suit injunctions. Time will tell how this guidance will be applied in practice. Meanwhile, other parties will attempt to obtain anti-suit injunctions from Russian courts. Whether they will be successful is a question yet to be answered.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact
more
less

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!