Decision Allowing Adjuster to Attend Plaintiff's Discovery in Tort MVA Matter


Although there is authority for the proposition that a party may be present during the examination for discovery of the party opposite or of a co-party, the Rules of Civil Procedure are silent on the issue as to who else may be present during an examination for discovery. In fact, until now, there had been no reported cases in Ontario on the issue. Lerners is pleased to have obtained the following precedent-setting decision whereby for the first time in Ontario, an adjuster was permitted by the court to attend a plaintiff’s examination for discovery in a tort motor vehicle accident matter.

In Purdy v. Isardi (Superior Court of Justice, September 14, 2012), the plaintiff suffered from soft tissue injuries and the claims adjuster with carriage of the matter wished to attend her discovery. In support of the motion, the claims adjuster deposed in an affidavit that he wished to attend the discovery in order “to observe the plaintiff, hear her testimony and assess her case in terms of settlement possibilities and defence strategies”.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Adjusters, Car Accident, Discovery

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lerners LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »