Wells vs. Americantex, Inc.

Decision of Court of Appeal

more+
less-

Our client, Americantex Inc., was the assignee of a money judgment. The judgment debtors brought a "motion to strike" the assignment and prevent our client from collecting on the judgment. The trial court denied this motion. The judgment debtors accused the trial judge of being biased and prejudiced, and then initiated this appeal. The court of appeal affirmed trial court's ruling, and awarded costs to our client.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: General Business Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robin Mashal, Century City Law Group, APC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Robin Mashal
Century City Law Group, APC

I am a California lawyer, and the managing shareholder of Century City Law Group, APC. I obtained... View Profile »


Follow Century City Law Group, APC:

Reporters on Deadline