Canal Street Films, Inc. v Does 1- 104

Defendant 61 Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Dismiss

more+
less-

Defendant Doe 61 requests any and all of the following relief

1. The Court should allow each individual Doe to proceed anonymously.

2. This case should be severed and all but the first Doe Defendant should be dismissed for improper Joinder.

3. A Protective Order should be issues preventing the Plaintiff from obtaining personal information about the Defendants.

4. This case should be severed and all but the first Doe Defendant should be dismissed for failure to pay the proper filing fees.

5. Such other relief as this Court deems just.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Trial Motions | Federal, 9th Circuit, Washington | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Timothy McCormack, McCormack Intellectual Property PS | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

Timothy McCormack
McCormack Intellectual Property PS

Timothy B. McCormack is a Seattle native with noteworthy international experience, having formally... View Profile »


Follow McCormack Intellectual Property PS:

Reporters on Deadline