Defendant Stockbroker’s Summary Judgment Motion Granted Against Unfair Competition Claim Focusing on Securities Transactions

more+
less-

An unfair competition claim brought against a stockbroker under California Business & Professions Code section 17200 must be dismissed on summary judgment because it is based on securities transactions. This was the February 25, 2011 ruling of the U.S. District Court for the United States District Court in San Francisco Residence Club v. Amado, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19230 (unpublished).

The case involved allegations that the broker advised the plaintiffs invest in tenant-in-common and membership-interest agreements involving real estate. The plaintiffs alleged that the broker helped conceal important facts about the developers, their lenders, and the rue value of the investment, and that he did so to profit personally from the investments. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, violations of section 12(a)(1) of the 1933 Act and section 17200 of the Business & Professions Code.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »