EFF handled this leading case with the ACLU of Washington State. In it, a federal district court in the Eastern District of Washington held that the identities of 23 participants in an Infospace chatroom were protected from disclosure. The case contained a strong endorsement of the right to anonymous speech online and set out a rigorous test for releasing the identities of John Does who were witnesses, rather than defendants. The test asks:
-Was the subpoena brought in good faith?
-Does the information relate to a core claim or defense?
-Is the identifying information directly and materially relevant to that claim or defense?
-Is the information available from other sources?
Please see full Defendant's Brief In Opposition below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Electronic Discovery Updates, Privacy Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Discovery Motions | Federal, 9th Circuit, Washington | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Electronic Frontier Foundation | Attorney Advertising