In re Supportsoft, Inc. Securities Litigation

Defendants' Letter Brief in Opposition to Motion to Compel Discovery

more+
less-

This case covers all purchasers of the securities of SupportSoft, Inc. (“SupportSoft”) during the period from January 20, 2004 through October 1, 2004.

Schatz Nobel Izard, P.C. was appointed as Co-Lead Counsel by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 22, 2005. An Amended Complaint, filed on August 23, 2005, alleges that Defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing false or misleading public statements regarding Supportsoft’s sales and business model and the changing nature of its contracts with customers. By an order entered on June 1, 2006, the Court certified the action to proceed as a class action.

This is a letter brief by Defendants opposing Plaintiffs' motion to overrule Defendants' objections to discovery requests and require Defendants to respond.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Discovery Motions | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Izard Nobel LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Izard Nobel LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×