Woody Allen v. American Apparel, Inc.

Defendant's Memorandum in support of Motion for Summary Judgment


The lawsuit filed by actor/director Woody Allen over the unauthorized use of his image by American Apparel, Inc. on a billboard is heating up in preparation for trial scheduled to start the week of May 18, 2009.

American Apparel President Dov Charney admits the image was taken from the movie Annie Hall and there was no request for permission to use Allen's likeness on the billboard. Charney defends the actions claiming fair use.

The billboards and images from the Annie Hall movie were intended to be a parody/social statement and comedic satire to provoke discussion and public discourse about the baseless claims that had been made against American Apparel and myself, society's reaction to lawsuits that delve into an individual's private sexual life and the media's sensationalism of such matters.

Allen does not see it exactly the same. Allen does not endorse any products in the US and believes this use of his image not only violates his right of publicity, a state law claim, but also creates a false association or endorsement, which is a claim brought under the federal lanham act.

From a legal wrangling standpoint, discovery has been a mess. American Apparel is attempting to drag in unrelated personal information via the discovery process. There are various motions flying back and forth to compel Allen to answer discovery questions and Allen is responding the requests are over-broad and will not lead to relevant information. American Apparel argues that Allen’s personal information is important in determining the value of his image in calculating damages.

From American Apparel’s standpoint what do they have to lose? I think from a legal standpoint the judge will deny American Apparels pending motion for summary judgment because there are factual issues regarding whether or not this use was a fair use. But, that said, if American Apparel settles or goes to trial, it may still be a cost effective marketing campaign.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Pleadings | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tamera Bennett, Bennett Law Office, PC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Tamera Bennett
Bennett Law Office, PC

Tamera H. Bennett is a wife, mom, lawyer, mediator, blogger, podcaster, and legal writer. Tamera... View Profile »

Follow Bennett Law Office, PC:

Reporters on Deadline

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.