Joseph Charles Gannon, et. ux. v. Mary Jo Eaton, et. al

Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment


The Plaintiff was a contract vendee of real properety who lost the contract. The Plaintiff sued the contract vendor for breach, but did not sue for specific performance. The property was re-sold to another after the lawsuit was filed. The Plaintiff then added our client, the replacement buyer.

This memorandum was filed in support of the replacement buyer's motion for summary judgment, which was granted. It argues that the Plaintiff's lawsuit did not create a "lis pendens" on the real property, absent a claim for specific performance. Since the Plaintiff sought only money damages for breach, there was no potential outcome that would impose equitable or legal relief against the replacement buyers.

Just another day in the sand box for Young & Valkenet!

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 4th Circuit, Maryland | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thomas Valkenet, Young & Valkenet | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Young & Valkenet on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.