Scott Wolfe Jr., et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, et al

Defendant's Memorandum Opposing Wolfe Motion for Summary Judgment

more+
less-

Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board (Defendants) responds to Plaintiff Scott Wolfe's Motion for Summary Judgment. They argue that the plaintiff's challenge is hypothetical, and that they lack standing. They also argue that the Plaintiff's challenge lacks merit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 5th Circuit, Louisiana | United States


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Blog No Evil, Inc. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Blog No Evil, Inc. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×