Scott Wolfe Jr., et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, et al

Defendant's Memorandum Opposing Wolfe Motion for Summary Judgment

more+
less-

Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board (Defendants) responds to Plaintiff Scott Wolfe's Motion for Summary Judgment. They argue that the plaintiff's challenge is hypothetical, and that they lack standing. They also argue that the Plaintiff's challenge lacks merit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 5th Circuit, Louisiana | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Blog No Evil, Inc. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »