Scott Wolfe Jr., et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, et al

Defendant's Memorandum Opposing Wolfe Motion for Summary Judgment


Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board (Defendants) responds to Plaintiff Scott Wolfe's Motion for Summary Judgment. They argue that the plaintiff's challenge is hypothetical, and that they lack standing. They also argue that the Plaintiff's challenge lacks merit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 5th Circuit, Louisiana | United States