Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board (Defendants) responds to Plaintiff Scott Wolfe's Motion for Summary Judgment. They argue that the plaintiff's challenge is hypothetical, and that they lack standing. They also argue that the Plaintiff's challenge lacks merit.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates
Reference Info:
Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication |
Federal, 5th Circuit, Louisiana |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Blog No Evil, Inc. | Attorney Advertising
