Mehta v. Farukhi

Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings


Plaintiffs sued defendant, their CPA, for advising them to invest in a private light manufacturing company (in which the CPA was a director) and allegedly inducing them to hold on to their investments by periodically telling them that "everything was great" or "things are fine." The company regularly provided plaintiffs with copies of the quarterly and annual financials, audited reports from Deloitte, and discussed the status of the company at shareholder meetings, which put plaintiffs on actual notice as to the company's performance. Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings asserts that generalized positive statements about the company's performance cannot be fraudulent as a matter of law, and do not give rise to a direct action against a director. To the extent any action could have been brought, it had to have been brought as a derivative action on behalf of the shareholders. Having failed to state a claim, the Fourth Amended Complaint must be dismissed with prejudice.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Securities Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »