Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Beasley

Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Statotory Restraining Order

more+
less-

Defendants' (Longboat Global Funds, Piranha Capital, and Robert Beasley) Opposition to the CFTC's Motion for TRO based on grounds that the CFTC has failed to put forward sufficient evidence demonstrating that either Longboat or Beasley made misrepresentations or omissions of material fact or that they possessed the requisite intent to defraud.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Business Torts Updates, General Business Updates, Finance & Banking Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Prejudgment Remedies | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »