Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Beasley

Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Statotory Restraining Order

more+
less-

Defendants' (Longboat Global Funds, Piranha Capital, and Robert Beasley) Opposition to the CFTC's Motion for TRO based on grounds that the CFTC has failed to put forward sufficient evidence demonstrating that either Longboat or Beasley made misrepresentations or omissions of material fact or that they possessed the requisite intent to defraud.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Prejudgment Remedies | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Scott Lawrence, Callahan & Blaine | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×