Gerald Wayne Corbitt v. Trang Thien Thi Than

Defendant's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

more+
less-

This is a response brief filed in response to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as well as the Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment based on the same facts and allegations conceded by the Plaintiff. The case arises from a non-compete clause contained in a business sales contract under Virginia law.

The oral argument transcript and final order can also be found on my page in JDSupra.

DISCLAIMER: CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY A LAWYER.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 4th Circuit, Virginia | United States