Gerald Wayne Corbitt v. Trang Thien Thi Than

Defendant's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

more+
less-

This is a response brief filed in response to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as well as the Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment based on the same facts and allegations conceded by the Plaintiff. The case arises from a non-compete clause contained in a business sales contract under Virginia law.

The oral argument transcript and final order can also be found on my page in JDSupra.

DISCLAIMER: CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY A LAWYER.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 4th Circuit, Virginia | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Richard H. Nguyen, Nguyen & Nguyen, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »