SIMPSON STRONG-TIE CO., INC., vs. PIERCE GORE, ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS'/RESPONDENTS' REPLY BRIEF

more+
less-

In this lawyer advertising case, attorney Pierce Gore published a two-sentence advertisement, warning wood deck owners about galvanized screws manufactured by three companies. The lawyer argues that he is protected by the commercial speech exemption to the state anti-SLAPP law. His reply brief requests that the California Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on April 7, 2010, NOT to exempt from the protection of the anti-SLAPP statute all statements or conduct that occur in the "course of delivering" a good or service. [See also the ruling of the California Court Of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentHandler.aspx?fid=17498 ]

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Firm Marketing Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States