Defining Prudent Underwriting: An International Struggle


In an attempt to insulate credit markets from the high-risk residential mortgage lending activities that threatened the global financial system in 2008, regulators both in the United States and elsewhere are seeking to impose stricter residential mortgage underwriting standards. Specifically, the U.S. Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act[1] (“Dodd-Frank”) in part to create “Grade-A” designations for residential mortgage loans that meet stringent underwriting requirements and other criteria. Those loans may enjoy a presumption of compliance with certain federal laws, and some may also be exempt from economic risk retention requirements that will apply to other loans.

Meanwhile, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”), an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system, issued Principles for Sound Residential Mortgage Underwriting Practices[2] (the “FSB Principles” or the “Principles”) for consideration by the FSB’s participating jurisdictions.[3] While the Principles do not delve into the details of specific underwriting practices, even to the extent of Dodd-Frank, they do suggest a targeted approach to imposing stricter requirements.

As described below, while many agree on the end-goal of achieving tighter residential mortgage underwriting, the devil is in the details. The FSB, like the regulators in the U.S. and elsewhere, is struggling to define any actual standards or specific criteria for achieving that goal. That lack of clarity spooks creditors and investors in the residential mortgage market, and threatens the supply of available mortgage credit, particularly for first-time and low-income borrowers. Without clearer standards, lenders may shy away from making loans to anyone, particularly those with less than stellar credit. Moreover, without greater certainty with respect to assignee liability and risk retention requirements, secondary mortgage market participants may lose their appetite for purchasing or securitizing loans that do not meet the highest underwriting criteria.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.