Delaware Chancery Court Dismisses Stockholder's Derivative Claim Because of Inadequate Representation for Failing to First Make a Section 220 Books and Records Request

more+
less-

On September 25, 2012, the Delaware Chancery Court dismissed, with prejudice, a named plaintiff's derivative claim because of inadequate representation. The dismissal applied to the named plaintiff's claim only — not to claims filed on behalf of other plaintiffs. The derivative action was filed in response to two class action lawsuits against the company, which alleged violations of the federal securities laws relating to the closure of one of its silver mines by the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration and a corresponding downward adjustment of the company's financial projections. The derivative action was based on "Caremark claims," where stockholders seek to hold directors liable to the corporation for injury the corporation suffers when the directors knowingly cause or consciously permit the corporation to violate positive law, or utterly fail to take steps to ensure the corporation's compliance with positive law.

 

Topics:  Caremark claim, Class Action, Derivative Suit, Section 220 Request, Shareholder Litigation, Shareholders

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Business Torts Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holland & Knight LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »