Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Liability for Failure to Negotiate in Good Faith

On appeal from the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Supreme Court, in SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc., recently held that an agreement to negotiate in good faith in accordance with a term sheet is an enforceable obligation and that the failure to negotiate in substantial conformity with the term sheet will, under certain circumstances, result in liability for expectation (or “benefit-of-the bargain”) damages.

Although the Court’s decision should not be read in isolation from the facts of the case, any party contemplating an agreement to negotiate in good faith should be cautious of the potential implications of setting forth transaction terms in a term sheet that is attached to or referenced in such agreement.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Incorporation, Liability, License Agreements, Mergers, Negotiations, Terms and Conditions

Published In: General Business Updates, Mergers & Acquisitions Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »