Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Insured's Payment of Defense Costs Does Not Trigger Excess Insurer's Payment Obligations

by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Contact

On September 7, 2012, the Delaware Supreme Court, applying California law, held that the payment obligations of an excess insurer of Intel were not triggered when Intel had settled with the underlying insurer for less than the policy limit and Intel itself had funded defense costs that, when combined with the settlement, exceeded the underlying insurer's policy limit. The court made the ruling despite a provision in the excess insurer's policy that provided that coverage would apply when "the insured or the insured's underlying insurance has paid or is obligated to pay the full amount" of the underlying insurer's policy limits. Intel Corp. v. Am. Guar. & Liab. Ins. Co., et al., No. 692, 2011 (Del. Sept. 7, 2012).

The matter arose after Intel was involved in antitrust litigation that quickly exhausted its $5 million primary insurance policy. Intel carried multiple excess policies, including a first excess layer of $50 million with XL Insurance Company (XL). Intel subsequently became involved in insurance coverage litigation with XL, which the parties settled with a $27.5 million payment to Intel for defense costs. Intel funded its own defense costs above that amount.

After Intel incurred defense costs in excess of XL's $50 million policy limit, it sought reimbursement from its second excess insurer, American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company (AGLI). AGLI denied coverage, and litigation ensued. The Delaware Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of AGLI, finding that AGLI's payment obligations had not been triggered. Intel appealed the decision.

On appeal, Intel argued that its payment of defense costs was sufficient to trigger AGLI's payment obligations. Intel relied on language in the AGLI policy that coverage "will not apply unless and until the insured or the insured's underlying insurance had been paid or is obligated to pay the full amount of the Underlying Limits."

In turn, AGLI argued that its payment obligations had not been triggered because of language in an endorsement to the policy that provided, "Nothing in this Endorsement shall obligate us to provide a duty to defend any claims or suit before the Underlying Insurance Limits . . . are exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements." AGLI contended that, notwithstanding Intel's payment of defense costs, the underlying limit had not been exhausted by "payment of judgments or settlements."

The Delaware Supreme Court agreed. The court reasoned that "Intel's reading of the AGLI policy purports to do exactly what Paragraph C of the Endorsement forbids: obligate AGLI to provide a duty to defend before exhaustion of the underlying . . . policy by payment of judgments or settlements." The court found that the seemingly contradictory provision, which is captioned "When Damages Are Payable" and states "[c]overage under this policy will not apply unless and until the insured or the insured's underlying insurance has paid or is obligated to pay the full amount of the [underlying policy limits]," applied only to Intel's payment of damages and not to defense costs.

The Intel decision is only the latest in a series of cases strictly applying policy language that effectively provides that an excess insurer's payment obligations are not triggered when an insured settles with an underlying insurer for less than full policy limits, and thereby attempts to satisfy the remaining limit of liability of the underlying policy with its own payments. Indeed, in Intel, the Delaware court cited the California Court of Appeals' decision in Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 161 Cal. App. 4th 184 (2008) (discussed here), in which the court held, based upon the policy language in that case, that when a company settled an insurance dispute with its primary insurer and the primary insurer paid less than the full limits of its policy, the company effectively forfeited all coverage from the excess carrier. Noting that the Qualcomm case involved different policy language, the Delaware court explained that "the implications of Qualcomm's holding for this case are clear. Plain policy language on exhaustion, such as that contained in Paragraph C, will control despite competing public policy concerns."

Because they were decided on the specific policy language at issue, the Intel and Qualcomm decisions demonstrate that companies must carefully review the language not only in their primary insurance policies, but also in their excess insurance policies. In particular, excess policies should have clear language providing that the policies are triggered when the insured or the insured's underlying insurance has paid or is obligated to pay the full amount of the underlying insurer's policy limits, and they should be reviewed carefully to insure that no other language in the policy suggests a different result. Otherwise, a company may not be able to settle a coverage dispute with its primary insurer without risking the loss of coverage under the excess policies.

Should you have any questions about the Intel decision or any related matters, please feel free to contact Steven Guggenheim, Katherine Henderson, or Jeff Palmer in Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's litigation department.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Contact
more
less

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.