Delaware Supreme Court Rules On whether A “Series Of Transactions” Should Be Aggregated In analyzing The Sale of “Substantially All” Assets Question

more+
less-

The Delaware Supreme Court recently ruled that a company’s proposed splitoff of assets should not be aggregated with three prior spinoff and splitoff transactions, where the proposed splitoff was not “sufficiently connected” to the prior transactions, for purposes of determining whether the company has disposed of “substantially all” of its assets. In an en Banc decision, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Liberty Media Corp., C.A. No. 5702 (Del. Supreme Ct.), the Court distinguished a series of related transactions consummated as part of an integrated plan from multiple transactions that are each a part of an overall business strategy, to determine whether a “series of transactions” warrant aggregation in the context of a “substantially all” analysis.

Please see full Newsletter below for further information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Mergers & Acquisitions Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »