"Deliberate Ignorance" Sufficient Mens Rea For Criminal Conviction Under DMCA

by Holland & Knight LLP
Contact

As a Circuit judge recently noted in dissent, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) strives to "achieve a balance between strengthening copyright law and preserving consumer rights, promoting technological innovation, and protecting First Amendment speech in our increasingly digitized culture." Some of the provisions in the DMCA that specifically pertain to "strengthening copyright law" are known as the "anti-circumvention" rules. These rules impose liability upon those who either (1) circumvented technological controls designed to prevent copyright as a means of committing copyright infringement, or (2) circumvented technological controls as a means of facilitating copyright infringement by another. See U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), 1201(a)(2). A willful accomplishment of either of these methods of circumvention is a criminal offense. See 17 U.S.C. § 1204(a).

The dissenting opinion quoted above comes from United States v. Reichert, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 1259610 (6th Cir. 2014), a case in which the Sixth Circuit confronted the question of whether the language in a jury instruction misrepresented the mens rea required to sustain a criminal conviction under the anti-circumvention provisions. The defendant Jeffrey Reichert (Reichert) ran a business in which he installed modification chips in video game consoles (consoles) to allow users to run software on the consoles for which they were not originally designed. Upon modification, the video game console could be utilized to play both legitimate video games and pirated ones. Thereafter, Leichert was charged with trafficking in technology "primarily designed or produced … for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected by copyright."

Leichert was subsequently convicted of this offense in a jury trial. On appeal, he objected in part on the grounds that the jury instruction stating that he could be convicted if he "deliberately ignored a high probability that he was trafficking in technology primarily designed" for circumvention misconstrued the mens rea requirement for a criminal conviction under the DMCA. Specifically, Leichert argued that this jury instruction allowed the jury to convict him upon finding he knew he was trafficking in circumvention technology, rather than upon a finding that he knew he was violating a law by trafficking in such technology. Though it conceded that "devoid of context, this part of the instruction lends some support for Reichert's provision," the court rejected Reichert's argument. First, it cited to a case that indicates that "awareness of broad criminal regulations obviously applicable to defendant's conduct may suffice for willfulness." See U.S. v. Roth, 628 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 2011). Next, it noted that the "deliberate ignorance" instruction was sandwiched between two other jury instructions that unequivocally instructed the jury that it could only convict Reichert of willfully violating the DMCA by a showing that "the [DMCA] imposed a duty on the Defendant, that the Defendant knew of this duty, and that he voluntarily and intentionally violated that duty." A separate jury instruction reiterated that Reichert could be convicted only if he was aware "of a high probability that he was violating the [DMCA] … and deliberately closed his eyes to what was obvious." Therefore, since Reichert had admitted he was operating in a "gray" area of the law and was "technically" not supposed to be implanting the modification chips, coupled with the general maxim that a single jury instruction should be examined on the whole, the court found the "deliberate ignorance" was insufficient to overturn the conviction for willfully trafficking in circumvention technology.

This holding prompted a strenuous dissent, largely premised on the notion that the charging statute has been subject to "various interpretations as to the exact legal status of the defendant's conduct." The dissent then catalogued how circuits heretofore had come to differing conclusions as to whether circumvention technologies designed primarily for purposes other than to bypass copyright restrictions were within the purview of the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions. In the Sixth Circuit, previous precedent held that these technologies were not violative of the anti-circumvention provisions. See Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. Static Control Components, 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004). According to the dissent, this precedent was particularly pertinent to the instant case since modification chips serve both lawful, e.g., non-infringing, and unlawful purposes. As applied to the anti-circumvention provisions and its exceptions, the dissent noted that the Librarian of Congress had inserted a regulatory exemption in 2003 to the DMCA which permitted a use of modification chips for reverse engineering. This existence of this exemption prompted arguments that a modification of video games via reverse engineering was not per se unlawful under the anti-circumvention provisions.

Given this background, the dissent argued that the jury instruction qua "deliberate ignorance" was insufficient to convey to the jury the willfulness requirement. Put another way, since certain reverse engineering type modifications of video game may not be a violation of the anti-circumvention provisions, Reichert may not have known that he was violating the DMCA when he engaged in the modifications. Additionally, the dissent rejected the "totality of the circumstances of the jury instructions" argument from the majority by noting that, although it was possible the conviction arose from the jury instructions explicitly specifying that willfulness of a violation of the law was a necessary condition to convict, it could have also arisen from the misstated deliberate ignorance instruction that did not unequivocally specify that Reichert must have known that he was violating the law, and not merely that he was trafficking in technology primarily designed to circumvent technological measures.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holland & Knight LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Holland & Knight LLP
Contact
more
less

Holland & Knight LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!