We wish the expression “only in California” hadn’t become so clichéd, but there are times when nothing less will do. This is such a time.
On May 18, the California Supreme Court got its chance in In re Tobacco II Cases, No. S147345 to decide what the voters of California meant when they enacted Proposition 64, the November 2004 initiative that sought to curtail the abuses in California’s unfair competition law, Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (“UCL”). But a 4-to-3 decision in this case, with a vigorous dissent, suggests that California’s efforts to shape a sensible class action law—or, at least, one that resembles other states’ and the federal courts’ class action laws—remains elusive.
Please see full update for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.