Did the California Supreme Court Put Out A "Welcome Mat" For Consumer Class Actions?

more+
less-

We wish the expression “only in California” hadn’t become so clichéd, but there are times when nothing less will do. This is such a time.

On May 18, the California Supreme Court got its chance in In re Tobacco II Cases, No. S147345 to decide what the voters of California meant when they enacted Proposition 64, the November 2004 initiative that sought to curtail the abuses in California’s unfair competition law, Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (“UCL”). But a 4-to-3 decision in this case, with a vigorous dissent, suggests that California’s efforts to shape a sensible class action law—or, at least, one that resembles other states’ and the federal courts’ class action laws—remains elusive.

Please see full update for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×